Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ court order; respondent's counsel placed on record the compliance speaking order dated 21.04.2026 passed in deference to the writ court's direction. The court took the order on record and disposed of the contempt petition as no further orders were required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[215] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1 1 84-2026 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 23.04.2026
Bhajanpr e et Kaur …Petitioner
Versus
Shri Niti s h Singla, PCS, Director School Educatio n , Chandigarh Administration, Sector 9, Chandigarh.
….Respondent
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Addl. Sta n ding Counsel, UT, Chandigarh. ****
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] Mr. Sobti, submits that the speaking order dated 21.04.202 6 in defere n ce of the order passed by the W rit Court (Annexure P-1) date d 04.04.20 2 5 in CWP-9606-2025 already s t ands passed. The same is take n on record.
[2] In view of the above, no f u rther orders are required to be passed i n the present contempt petitio n . The same is ordered to be disposed o ff.
[3] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stan d s disposed o ff .
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
23.04.20 2 6
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 13:40 I agree to specified portions of this document
Bhajanpreet Kaur
Shri Nitesh Singla, PCS, Director School Education, Chandigarh Administration
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
