Dismissed¶17

Dalip Singh and Ors. v. Naranjan Singh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Nov 2025RSA/915/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; RSA-915-1999; decided 10.11.2025; Judge Amarinder Singh Grewal; appellants Dalip Singh and Others; respondents Naranjan Singh and Others; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; counsel without instructions; appellants No.1 and 2 deceased; liberty to seek revival; pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellants to seek its revival in case any cogent cause of action survives; pending application(s), if any, also disposed of. ¶17

Dalip Singh and Ors. Vs Naranjan Singh and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

(212)

¶3

RSA-915-1999 Date of Decision:-10.11.2025

¶4

Dalip Singh and Others

¶5

……Appellants

¶6

Versus

¶7

Naranjan Singh and Others

¶8

……Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶10

¶11

Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Digvijay Manchanda, Advocate, for the appellants.

¶12

Mr. I.S. Brar, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶13

¶14

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

¶15

As per the report of the Registry, appellants No.1 and 2 have expired. Notices issued to respondents No.3 and 4 have been received back served. The notice issued to respondent No.5 has been received back with the report that he is confined in jail.

¶16

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite repeated efforts, he has not been able to establish contact with appellants No.3 to 5 or with the legal representatives of deceased appellants No.1 and 2. Even today, learned counsel has expressed his inability to proceed further in the matter as he continues to have no instructions or communication from the appellants.

¶17