Dismissed¶14

Kulwant Rai and Ors. v. Pargat Singh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Aug 2025RSA/636/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of parties; notice served; death of appellants No.1 and 4; appellant No.3 served through son; respondent No.4 served through brother; stale appeal of 1997; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Justice Mandeep Pannu; RSA-636-1997 (O&M); Kulwant Rai and others v. Pargat Singh and others.

What did the court decide?

The present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared before the Court despite service of notice. ¶14

Kulwant Rai and Ors. Vs Pargat Singh and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

RSA-636-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.8.2025

¶3

Kulwant Rai and others … Appellants Versus Pargat Singh and others ... Respondents

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

¶5

Present:None.

¶6

¶7

MANDEEP PANNU, J.(Oral)

¶8

A perusal of the order dated 12.12.2023 reveals that none was present on behalf of either of the parties. Since, the present RSA pertains to the year 1997, therefore, notice to the parties were issued.

¶9

As per office report, notices issued to appellants No.1 and 4 have been received back with the report that they have died. Notices issued to appellant No.2, 5 and 6 have been received back served and notice issued to appellant No.3 has also been received back served through son. Notices issued to respondents No.1 to 3 and 5 have been received back served and notice issued to respondent No.4 has been received back served through brother. But, none has come present before this Court on behalf of either of the parties. It seems that no one is interested to pursue with the present case.

¶10

GEETA RANI 2025.08.18 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

¶11

RSA-636-1997 (O&M)

¶12

( 2 )

¶13

In view of the aforestated position, the present appeal is hereby

¶14

dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶15