Jito v. Shanti Devi

What is this about?

Extraction not possible: the supplied judgment text is corrupted by broken character encoding, and virtually every paragraph consists of unreadable replacement characters. The only fully legible strings are a recurring digital-signature attestation line ('GAURAV SOROT 2025.11.21 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document') and the template line 'Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No :', whose answer is itself illegible. No court, case number, parties, advocates, dates, statutes, case citations, issues, holdings, treatments or outcome could be verified verbatim, so all fields are returned null/empty under the no-invention rule. A clean copy of the judgment should be re-supplied for extraction.