Dismissed¶¶15
Ganpat Singh v. Jagmal Singh
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/3802/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal in default for want of prosecution; appellant non-appearance / loss of interest; Ganpat Singh v. Bhim and Others; RSA-3802-1999 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Justice Deepak Gupta; decision dated 11.11.2025; Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 28.05.2001; no counsel for appellant; no issues framed; no statutes or precedents cited; oral single-judge order; attested by Neetika Tuteja.
What did the court decide?
Finding no representation for the appellant even on the last two dates of hearing and taking the appellant to be no longer interested in pursuing the appeal, the learned Judge dismissed the Regular Second Appeal in default for want of prosecution. ¶¶15