Dismissed¶17
Ram Chander v. Dharambir
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/3716/1998
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; RSA-3716-1998; Ram Chander (appellant) vs Dharambir (respondent); decided 25.08.2025 by Justice Mandeep Pannu (oral judgment); appeal of 1998 vintage dismissed for want of prosecution; appellant unrepresented (counsel without instructions) and legal representatives unknown; advocates G.S. Jaswal (appellant) and R.A. Sehoran (respondent); no statutes or precedents cited; non-speaking disposal, quantum/monetary terms none.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because appellant's counsel had no instructions and no legal representatives of the appellant were known to either side. ¶17