Dismissed¶16

Baljit Singh and Anr. v. Mehar Singh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Nov 2025RSA/3637/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal of appeal RSA-3637-2019 (O&M), Baljit Singh & Anr v. Mehar Singh & Ors, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, Alka Sarin J (Oral), 21.11.2025; appellants untraced per office report; adjournment slip rejected - circulator neither filing counsel nor holding memo of appearance; repeated adjournment requests with no one present in Court; pending applications disposed off.

What did the court decide?

The adjournment slip filed by Ms. Shruti, Advocate, who is neither the filing counsel nor holds any memo of appearance, cannot be accepted. ¶14

Baljit Singh and Anr. Vs Mehar Singh and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

110

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

RSA-3637-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.11.2025

¶4

Baljit Singh & Anr ... Appellant(s) Versus Mehar Singh & Ors ... Respondent(s)

¶5

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

¶6

Present : None.

¶7

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

¶8

On 13.11.2024 the following order was passed :

¶9

“ On 09.02.2024 none appeared on behalf of the appellants and on a written request the case was adjourned to today. Today, yet again, a written request for an adjournment has been circulated on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants on the ground that the appellants are not in touch and his instructions are incomplete, though none is present in Court to press the said written request. In view thereof, let notices be issued to the appellants returnable 14.07.2025.”

¶10

Today a written request for an adjournment has been circulated by Ms. Shruti, Advocate on the ground that her instructions are incomplete, though no one is present in Court to press the said adjournment slip. It was on a similar request made on 13.11.2024 that notice was issued to the appellants.

¶11

YOGESH SHARMA 2025.11.22 08:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh

¶12

RSA-3637-2019 (O&M)

¶13

¶14

It is also to be seen that Ms. Shruti, Advocate, who has filed the adjournment slip, is neither the filing counsel nor has any memo of appearance been filed on her behalf. In view thereof the adjournment slip cannot be accepted.

¶15

As per the office report, the appellants remain untraced. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.

¶16

Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

¶17

21.11.2025 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE

¶18

NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO

¶19

YOGESH SHARMA 2025.11.22 08:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh

Baljit Singh and Anr. v. Mehar Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baljit Singh and Anr. v. Mehar Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Kumar Vs Hanish Kumar and Ors.

Gurmeet Kaur Vs Karnail Singh

Manpreet Kaur Vs Uttam Singh and Others

Udai Ram Alias Udey Ram Vs Chanderbhan and Others

Kamruddin @ Kamrudin and Another Vs Jilsad and Others

Suresh Pal Vs Ram Kumar and Ors.