State of Haryana and Others v. Shiv Dayal
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: overtime allowance; revised basic payscale; difference of overtime payment; interest on arrears; limitation of claim by plaintiff's statement; three years' arrears prior to suit; infructuous appeal; cross objections; State of Haryana transport drivers and conductors; Director General State Transport letter dated 01.04.2025; District Judge Kurukshetra judgment and decree dated 21.03.2001; Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kurukshetra order dated 31.10.2001 trial Court order dated 31.10.2000; RSA No.3073 of 2001 (O&M); XOBJR-6-C-2002(O&M); decided 15.09.2025 by Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Holding: RSA disposed of as infructuous on appellants' own submission; cross objections for three years' interest dismissed because plaintiff had limited his claim to three years' overtime arrears; no infirmity found in Lower Appellate Court decree.