respondents were aware of the weakness of Jagbir and with a malafide intention confined Jagbir on 31.05.2006. On 15.06.2006 all the defendantrespondents in furtherance of their common intention procured a sale deed of his share on payment of an ostensible sale consideration of ₹16,66,000. As per the recital in the sale deed, the payment was made through a bank transaction, however, later the amount was alleged to have been got transferred by them by opening a new account for Jagbir. It was further averred that plaintiff-appellant No.1, on coming to know of the sale deed, filed a complaint in the Court of Sub-Divisional, Judicial Magistrate (SDJM), Palwal on 16.07.2007 and an inquiry was ordered under Section 202 CrPC. Since the complaint had been sent to the Station House Officer (SHO), RS City Palwal, the defendant-respondents became aware of the same and immediately filed a complaint in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (JMIC) Palwal under Sections 364, 323, 506, 342, 347, 348, 384, 386 read with Section 34 IPC which was alleged to be totally false and baseless. It was further averred that they have filed a civil suit challenging the validity of the sale deed dated 15.06.2006 also. It was further the case set up that the defendant-respondents with the malafide intention dragged the plaintiff-appellants upto the High Court on the point of Court fees. It was further averred that in the criminal case the plaintiff-appellants were acquitted and that they incurred heavy expenses due to the litigation.
