Banwari Lal Vs Sardara and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Banwari Lal Vs Sardara and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Regular Second Appeal RSA-2795-2002 (O&M) disposed of in terms of the compromise dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure A-2); parties declared bound by the compromise terms, failing which necessary consequences shall follow; pending applications disposed of; decree sheet(s) to be drawn accordingly.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Regular Second Appeal RSA-2795-2002 (O&M) should be disposed of in terms of the compromise dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure A-2) arrived at between the parties.

Court's answer

The present Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in view of the compromise; the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise, failing which necessary consequences shall follow.

Ratio / Principle

Application CM-11023-C-2025 (amendment of CM No.8172-C-2025) is allowed, and the Annexure qua compromise is to be read as 'Annexure A-2' wherever mentioned in the application.

Key takeaways

Application CM-8172-C-2025, seeking disposal of the main appeal in terms of the compromise (Annexure A-2) dated 26.05.2025, is allowed.ratio¶23
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.ratio¶28
Decree sheet(s) be drawn accordingly.ratio¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Punjab & Haryana High Court (Ramesh Kumari J., oral), RSA-2795-2002 (O&M) — Banwari Lal (since deceased through LRs) v. Sardara and others — decided 05.09.2025: the Regular Second Appeal was disposed of in terms of a compromise dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure A-2) arrived at between the parties. The disposal application CM-8172-C-2025 was allowed, as was CM-11023-C-2025, which amended CM No.8172-C-2025 to correct the Annexure reference for the compromise from Annexure A-1 to Annexure A-2. The parties were declared bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise, failing which necessary consequences shall follow; pending applications stand disposed of and decree sheet(s) were directed to be drawn accordingly. No statutory provision or precedent was cited; the underlying dispute and any impugned lower-court order are not described in the text.

1

RSA-2795-2002 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

103

RSA-2795-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 05, 2025

Banwari Lal (since deceased through LRs) .....Appellants(s)

Vs.

Sardara and others

......Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI

Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Lalit Chander, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Yogesh K. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.6 to 9 and 11.

RAMESH KUMARI J. (ORAL)

Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the appellants by filing Vakalatnama in the Court today and the same is taken on record.

CM-11023-C-2025

The present application has been filed for amendment in the application bearing CM No.8172-C-2025 vide which ‘Annexure A-1’ has been mentioned qua compromise, whereas compromise was annexed as ‘Annexure A-2’.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and Annexure qua compromise be read as ‘Annexure A-2’, wherever it is mentioned in the application.

SONIA ARORA 2025.09.09 17:41 I agree to specified portions of this document

2

RSA-2795-2002 (O&M)

CM-8172-C-2025

The instant application has been filed for disposal of the main appeal bearing RSA No.2795-2002 in terms of compromise (Annexure A-2) dated 26.05.2025 arrived at between the parties.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed.

RSA-2795-2002

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties have settled their dispute by way of compromise dated 26.05.2025 Annexure A-2 and seeks permission to dispose of the instant regular second appeal in view of the said compromise.

Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the submission made by learned counsel for the appellants.

In view of the above, the present Regular Second Appeal is disposed of . It is clarified that the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise, failing which necessary consequences shall follow.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Decree sheet(s) be drawn accordingly.

(RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE

September 05, 2025 sonia arora

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No

SONIA ARORA 2025.09.09 17:41 I agree to specified portions of this document