Dismissed¶15
Bachani v. Chano
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/2531/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution (repeated non-appearance/default by appellant); liberty to revive appeal within three months; consequential disposal of miscellaneous applications; RSA No. 2531 of 1999 (O&M); Smt. Bachni @ Bachan Kaur (appellant) versus Smt. Channo @ Chanan Kaur (since deceased) through LRs (respondent); counsel for respondent: Davinder Kumar; Justice Virinder Aggarwal, oral order dated 12.11.2025; no statutes or precedent cases cited; merits of the underlying dispute not addressed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; appellant given liberty to revive the appeal, if having any grievance from this order, within three months from the date of decision. ¶15