Dismissed¶10
Bachittar Singh v. Veer Pal Kaur
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/2214/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal in default for want of prosecution of regular second appeal due to non-appearance of duly served appellant; Bachittar Singh v. Veer Pal Kaur; RSA-2214-1996 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Justice Deepak Gupta (oral); decision date 26.11.2025; notice under order dated 02.12.2023 duly served per Registry report; no advocate appearance; speaking/reasoned but not reportable.
What did the court decide?
The sole appellant-Bachittar Singh was duly served as reported by the Registry, but there was no representation on his behalf, and it appears the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. ¶8