Appeal withdrawal; RSA No.1666 of 1993 (O&M); Gurnam Singh and others v. Hardip Kaur and others; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Vikram Aggarwal J.; decided 09.07.2025; dismissed as withdrawn; appellants did not wish to pursue appeal; no merits adjudicated.
Permission to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶16
On the appellants' counsel stating that the appellants did not wish to pursue the appeal or challenge the impugned judgments, the Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. ¶16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
126
RSA No.1666 of 1993 (O&M) Date of Decision :09.07.2025
Gurnam Singh and others
......Appellants
Versus
Hardip Kaur and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present : Mr. B.S.Baath, Advocate for the appellants.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (Oral):
not wish to pursue the appeal and to challenge the impugned judgments.
withdraw the present appeal.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE
09.07.2025
Manoj Bhutani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2025.07.18 09:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal, their counsel having stated that they do not wish to pursue the appeal or challenge the impugned judgments.medium confidence¶15
On the appellants' counsel stating that the appellants did not wish to pursue the appeal or challenge the impugned judgments, the Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.ratio¶16
How this case reached the court
Impugned judgment(s) under challenge in this regular second appeal; counsel for the appellants subsequently stated that the appellants did not wish to pursue the appeal or challenge them. Details of the impugned judgments are not set out in this judgment.¶13
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
