Defendant appealed against concurrent decrees in a mandatory injunction suit. Courts below found the license terminated by notice and agreement to vacate, and that defendant fabricated a tenancy claim via a suit against a man who died in 1981. No ground to interfere was found and the appeal was dismissed.
None granted; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA-1454-2025 (O&M) -1-
151 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1454-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.05.2025
Baij Nath
...Appellant
Vs.
Raghuvir Singh Basra
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Nitish Garg, Advocate for the appellant.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
NEERAJ 2025.05.22 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA-1454-2025 (O&M) -2-
as a tenant or he paid any rent to either Sh. Bakhsish Singh or his heirs.
out.
disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 19.05.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No
NEERAJ 2025.05.22 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Baij Nath
Raghuvir Singh Basra
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
