Dismissed¶2

Pupran v. Lakhi Ram

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Dec 2025RSA/1014/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular Second Appeal RSA No. 1014 of 1999 (O&M), Puran v. Lakhi Ram, Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh, decided 11.12.2025 by Justice Virinder Aggarwal (oral); appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; both parties deceased (appellant's notice returned with death report; sole respondent dead); no LRs impleaded; suit was for permanent injunction only; liberty to appellant's LRs to revive appeal within three months; miscellaneous applications disposed accordingly; none appeared for either side; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, with liberty to the LRs of the appellant to revive the same, if aggrieved, within three months. ¶2

Pupran Vs Lakhi Ram — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

214

¶3

RSA No. 1014 of 1999 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- 11.12.2025

Puran

...Appellant

Versus

Lakhi Ram

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

¶10

Present :- None for the appellant.

¶11

None for the respondent.

¶12

¶13

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)

¶14

None is present on behalf of the parties. Notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report of his death. Even sole respondent has died. None has come present for getting themselves impleaded as LRs of either party. The suit was for permanent injunction only. It seems that LRs of the parties are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal.

¶15

In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the LRs of the appellant to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today.

¶16