Lachmi Devi & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Source text is corrupted: virtually all substantive content renders as unreadable replacement/mojibake glyphs, so no court, case number, parties, advocates, procedural history, statutes, cited precedents, issues, holdings or outcome could be grounded in verbatim text. The only legible content is the recurring digital-signature attestation "SONIKA 2025.11.17 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document" (appearing at paras 2, 10, 16, 21, 30 and 37), indicating a digitally authenticated copy signed on 17 November 2025; that timestamp was not treated as the decision date.
SONIKA