Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jai Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Punjab & Haryana HC
2025
Jai Parkash Vs State of Haryana and OthersJai Parkash v. State of Haryana and Others

Disposed¶20

Jai Parkash v. State of Haryana and Others

Review Application – order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent it denied arrears

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Nov 2025RA-CW/92/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RA-CW-92-2025, Jai Parkash v. State of Haryana and Ors., Punjab and Haryana High Court, decided 07.11.2025 by Justice Jagmohan Bansal (oral). Review of order dated 17.01.2025 denying arreals; relying on judgment dated 22.01.2025 in CWP-10071-2022 (Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Haryana), the Court modified the order: petitioner entitled to arrears from date of filing petition if eligible for regularization under Policy of 2011; arrears without interest. Keywords: review, regularization Policy 2011, arrears, date of filing, no interest.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 17.01.2025 modified to the extent of denial of arrears: petitioner entitled to arrears from the date of filing his petition if found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011, without interest; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶20

Why is it important?

This Court finds it appropriate to modify order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent that the applicant was denied arrears, in view of the reasons set out in the application and the submissions of both sides. ¶19

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Order dated 17.01.2025 modified to the extent of denial of arrears: petitioner entitled to arrears from the date of filing his petition if found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011, without interest; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant-petitioner, whose case is claimed to be covered by the judgment dated 22.01.2025 in CWP-10071-2022 (Sanjeev Kumar), is entitled to review/modification of order dated 17.01.2025 so as to receive arrears from the date of filing his petition.

Court's answer

This Court finds it appropriate to modify order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent that the applicant was denied arrears, in view of the reasons set out in the application and the submissions of both sides.

Ratio / Principle

Paragraph 5 of order dated 17.01.2025 is directed to be read as: the petitioner shall be entitled to arrears from the date of filing the petition before this Court if he is found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011, and the arrears shall not carry interest.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review Application — order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent it denied arrears — applicant's case covered by judgment dated 22.01.2025 in CWP-10071-2022, Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. — paragraph 5 of order dated 17.01.2025 directed to be read as: petitioner entitled to arrears from the date of filing the petition if found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011 — arrears shall not carry interest — application disposed of; pending application(s) also disposed of.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

214

RA-CW-92-2025 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025

JAI PARKASH ...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:Petitioner-in person

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG Haryana

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

The applicant-petitioner through instant application is seeking review of order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent he has been denied arrears.

The applicant, who is present in-person, has submitted in the application that his case was not decided along with bunch of petitions. By judgment dated 22.01.2025 passed in a bunch of petitions including CWP-10071-2022 titled as “Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.” , it has been held that if any petitioner is found eligible to regularization as per Policy of 2011, he shall be entitled to arrears from the date of filing petition before this Court. The applicant is entitled to same relief.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RA-CW-92-2025

-2-

Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 expressed his inability to controvert that by aforesaid judgment dated 22.01.2025, it has been held that petitioners shall be entitled to arrears from the date of filing petition. The case of applicant is covered by said judgment. However, he opposes prayer of the applicant.

In the wake of reasons set out in the application and submissions of both sides, this Court finds it appropriate to modify order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent that applicant was denied arrears. Henceforth the words and expressions “It is made clear that if he is found eligible for regularization as per Police of 2011, he shall not be entitled to arrears.” used in paragraph No.5 of order dated 17.01.2025 be read as “The petitioner shall be entitled to arrears from the date of filing petition before this Court if he is found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011. The arrears shall not carry interest.”

5. Disposed of in above terms.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE

November 07, 2025

Deepak DPA

Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the applicant-petitioner, whose case is claimed to be covered by the judgment dated 22.01.2025 in CWP-10071-2022 (Sanjeev Kumar), is entitled to review/modification of order dated 17.01.2025 so as to receive arrears from the date of filing his petition.¶13
The court held
This Court finds it appropriate to modify order dated 17.01.2025 to the extent that the applicant was denied arrears, in view of the reasons set out in the application and the submissions of both sides.ratio¶19

Cases cited

Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority

AI extract

Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.Relied on¶14
CWP-10071-2022

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 17.01.2025 passed in the petitioner's matter, insofar as it denied him arrears; paragraph 5 thereof contained the words denying arrears, now sought to be reviewed and read down.¶13
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh · 17.01.2025
Prior proceeding
Judgment dated 22.01.2025 in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP-10071-2022 (Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Haryana), holding that petitioners found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011 are entitled to arrears from the date of filing their petitions; the applicant claims to be covered by it and seeks the same relief.¶14

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Jai Parkash¶5
respondent
State of Haryana and Ors.¶7
Ravi Partap Singh, Deepak Balyan

Coram

AI extract

Jagmohan Bansalauthor¶8

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Punjab & Haryana HC
Decided on: 7 Nov 2025 · November
Registered: 19 Feb 2025
Case no.: RA-CW/92/2025
CNR: PHHC010280622025
Bench: Jagmohan Bansal
Disposal: DISPOSED OF
Case type: RA-CW

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Jagmohan Bansal

Gurmail Singh Vs State of Pb and Others
6 Nov 2025
Parmanand Sharma Vs State of Hy. & Ors.
6 Nov 2025
Guravtar Singh Vs Ut Chandigarh and Others
6 Nov 2025
Aasma Grover Vs State of Punjab and Ors.
7 Nov 2025
Jangir Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.
7 Nov 2025
Anuj Mahajan Vs State of Haryana & Anr.
7 Nov 2025

Cite this judgement

Jai Parkash v. State of Haryana and Others, RA-CW/92/2025 (P&H), decided on 7 November 2025.

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Cases cited1

Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.Relied on¶14

Open Authorities

Procedural history2

Order dated 17.01.2025 passed in the petitioner's matter, insofar as it denied him arrears; paragraph 5 thereof contained the words denying arrears, now sought to be reviewed and read down.High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh · 17.01.2025
Judgment dated 22.01.2025 in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP-10071-2022 (Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Haryana), holding that petitioners found eligible for regularization as per Policy of 2011 are entitled to arrears from the date of filing their petitions; the applicant claims to be covered by it and seeks the same relief.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Jagmohan Bansal

Parties & counsel