Ranbir Singh v. Ramphal and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court; RA-CR-40-2025 in FAO-7171-2017; Ranbir Singh v/s Ramphal and Anr.; review application dismissed; Order 47 CPC; no mistake or ambiguity apparent; interest 9% per annum granted by learned Tribunal versus 6% per annum from date of filing of appeal; judgment dated 04.03.2025; decided 02.04.2025 by Archana Puri, Judge; advocates Narender Kaajla, Neeraj Khanna, Ravinder Arora.
What did the court decide?
The concluding two paragraphs of the judgment dated 04.03.2025 are self-speaking: they categorically mention the extent of interest to which the appellants are entitled and the period from which it has been granted, and further mention that all the remaining terms as ordered by the learned Tribunal shall remain the same; therefore there is no mistake or ambiguity apparent in that judgment. ¶7