Hari Om v. Financial Commissioner and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
LPA-884-2025 (O&M) and LPA-915-2025 (O&M); comparative candidature of petitioner Shamsher v. respondent no. 4 Hari Om, including recommendations by Tehsildar and SDO (Civil); judgment body redacted/missing - no bench, holdings, statutes, precedents or disposition extractable; only attestation stamp dated 2025-07-07 and comparative table at para 16 survive.
What the court decided
-1-
LPA-884-2025 (O&M) LPA-915-2025 (O&M)
Present:
SUNIL 2025.07.07 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2-
LPA-884-2025 (O&M) LPA-915-2025 (O&M)
SUNIL 2025.07.07 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-3-
LPA-884-2025 (O&M) LPA-915-2025 (O&M)
SUNIL 2025.07.07 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-4-
LPA-884-2025 (O&M) LPA-915-2025 (O&M)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Comparative assessment of the competing candidatures of Shamsher (petitioner) and respondent no. 4 Hari Om on age, education, land holding, occupation and official recommendation (Tehsildar vis-a-vis SDO (Civil)), in what appears to be an appointment-selection proceeding; remarks referencing 'Sarbarah Lambardar' suggest a Lambardar-context dispute.medium confidence¶16
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- LPA/884/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court