Disposed¶5

Vishal Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC19 May 2025LPA/718/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

LPA No.718 of 2025 (O & M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Vishal Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others; Extension Lecturers removal and relieving; CWP No.5299 of 2025; interlocutory order dated 25.2.2025; interim relief prayer para 9(vi) pending; decline of interference; liberty to approach learned Single Judge; no comments on merits; CM No.18422025 disposed; appeal disposed of; decision 19.5.2025; Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice; Sumeet Goel, Judge.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellants to move the learned Single Judge for deciding the prayer for interim relief made in paragraph No. 9 (vi) of CWP No.5299 of 2025; the appeal and pending miscellaneous applications (including CM No.18422025) stand disposed of. ¶5

Vishal Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶5

Issue for consideration

Whether interference is warranted in an intra-court appeal against an interlocutory order that entertains the petition but passes no effective order on the pending prayer for interim relief.

¶3

Court's answer

As no effective order had been passed on the question of interim relief, the Court declined interference in the present appeal.

¶3

Ratio / Principle

The Court extended liberty to the appellants to move the learned Single Judge for deciding the prayer for interim relief made in paragraph No. 9 (vi) of CWP No.5299 of 2025.

¶3

Key takeaways

The Court made no comments on the merits of the controversy involved.obiter¶4
With the aforesaid liberty, the instant appeal stands disposed of.ratio¶5
Pending miscellaneous application(s), including CM No.18422025, stand disposed of accordingly.ratio¶6

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Intra-court appeal (LPA No.718 of 2025 (O & M)) before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh by Vishal Singh and others against the State of Haryana and others, assailing an interlocutory order dated 25.2.2025 passed in CWP No.5299 of 2025, whereby the appellants' petition against their removal and relieving from the post of Extension Lecturers was entertained and notices issued, but the prayer for interim relief (paragraph No. 9 (vi) of the petition) was left undecided. Finding that no effective order had been passed on the question of interim relief, the Court (Sheel Nagu, CJ, orally, with Sumeet Goel, J) declined interference in the appeal, extended liberty to the appellants to move the learned Single Judge for a decision on the interim relief prayer, expressly made no comments on the merits of the controversy, and disposed of the appeal together with pending miscellaneous applications including CM No.18422025. Decision dated 19.5.2025.

Vishal Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mohinder Singh Vs High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

M/S Gurinder Singh Contractor and Another Vs State of Punjab and Another

Onkar Nath and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Satnam Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research through Its Authorized Signatory Vs State of Punjab and Others