Sant Ram v. State of Haryana and Ors.

What is this about?

Extraction failed: the supplied judgment text is corrupted (mojibake/replacement characters throughout). Paragraphs ¶1–¶19 contain no recoverable words, so court, case number, parties, advocates, procedural history, statutes, cited precedents, issues, holdings and outcome could not be identified without fabrication and were left null/empty per the no-invention rule. The only legible text is the digitisation attestation at ¶20 ('AMIT KUMAR 2025.03.03 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document'), which identifies neither a bench nor any party and therefore was not treated as coram. A clean copy of the judgment is required for re-extraction.