Appeal against dismissal of a writ petition in which costs were imposed for suppression of earlier petitions. No one appeared for the appellant on multiple hearings despite a warning, and the Division Bench dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
LPA-505-2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
121
LPA-505-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 11, 2025
Seema Sharma
......Appellant(s)
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
......Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Present: None for the appellant.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA J. (ORAL)
Learned Single Judge vide order dated 06.09.2024 has dismissed the writ petition after observing that filing of earlier petition(s) was suppressed and a costs of Rs.30,000/- has been imposed.
“In the interest of justice, adjourned to 11.08.2025.
In case, arguments are not addressed on the next date of hearing, this appeal may be dismissed in default/for nonprosecution.”
the appeal.
SONIA ARORA 2025.08.13 09:58 I agree to specified portions of this document
2
LPA-505-2025 (O&M)
(ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE
(ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE August 11, 2025 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No
SONIA ARORA 2025.08.13 09:58 I agree to specified portions of this document
Seema Sharma
State of Punjab
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rohit Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
