Matri Alias Sharda v. Maha Singh and Others

What is this about?

The supplied judgment text is almost entirely corrupted (unreadable/mojibake characters across paragraphs 1-149). No party names, case number, coram, statutes, cited precedents, issues, holdings, quantum or disposition could be verified verbatim, so all such fields are returned empty/null rather than guessed. The only fully legible recurring string is the digital-signature attestation 'MAHIMA 2025.03.12 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.' (first at para 16), from which a signature/decision date of 12 March 2025 is inferred. This record should not be cited on the basis of the extracted data; re-ingest a clean copy of the judgment.