Disposed¶9

Kusum Devi v. Balwinder Singh & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC5 May 2025FAO/1200/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat order, FAO appeal, non-appearance of appellant and counsel, notice served through brother-in-law, file consigned to record, liberty to revive appeal by application, Kusum Devi appellant, Balwinder Singh & Ors. respondents, HDFC ERGO GIC represented by Punit Jain, bench G.C. Garg (President) and Mahavir Singh Chauhan (Member), dated 05.05.2025; purely administrative/procedural disposal with no ratio on substantive law.

What did the court decide?

File consigned to record, with liberty to the appellant to seek revival by moving an appropriate application; a copy of the order to be given to learned counsel for the parties and also sent to the appellant's last known address. The appeal itself is left unresolved, not decided either way. ¶9

Kusum Devi Vs Balwinder Singh & Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

DAILY LOK ADALAT

¶2

BENCH NO.3

¶3

507 FAO-1200-2016 KUSUM DEVI VS BALWINDER SINGH & ORS.

¶4

Present: None for the appellant

¶5

Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for HDFC ERGO GIC.

¶6

¶7

After noticing that learned c ounsel, who filed this appeal , did not p ut in appearance, notice wa s issued to the appellant fo r today. Th e said notice has been receive d back with the report, ‘serve d through brother-in-law.’

¶8

None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellan t today as w ell.

¶9

In view of the above, the fil e is ordered to be consigned t o record. Li b erty is, however, granted to t he appellant to get it revived , by movin g an appropriate application.

¶10

A copy of this order be gi v en to learned counsel for th e parties. A copy of this order be also se n t at the last known address o f the appellant.

¶11

( G.C. GARG)

¶12

PRESIDENT

¶13

(MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER 05.05.2025

¶14