Sketchy PIL concerning 'Har Ghar Jal Yojna' dismissed with liberty to file afresh; scheme neither discussed nor attached; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Sheel Nagu CJ and Sumeet Goel J; CWP-PIL-106-2025 (O&M); decided 08.05.2025.
Liberty to the petitioner to file the petition afresh, if so advised. ¶15
The petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, revolves around 'Har Ghar Jal Yojna', but the said scheme has neither been discussed nor attached to the petition. ¶13
(118)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-PIL-106-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:- 08.05.2025
Ram Kumar
...Petitioner(s) Versus
The State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate, Mr. Rubal Pawar, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Badal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, with Ms. Khushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for the respondents.
SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (ORAL)
(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE
(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE
08.05.2025
Amodh Sharma
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
AMODH SHARMA 2025.05.09 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation revolving around the 'Har Ghar Jal Yojna' scheme (which was neither discussed nor attached to the petition), being sketchy, could be entertained by the Court.¶14
The petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, revolves around 'Har Ghar Jal Yojna', but the said scheme has neither been discussed nor attached to the petition.ratio¶13
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
