Dismissed¶¶21

M/S Hvr Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. Union of India and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Apr 2025CWP/8869/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, CWP-8869-2025 (O&M), decided 22.04.2025 (Lisa Gill and Sudeepti Sharma, JJ.; judgment by Lisa Gill, J.). Writ petition by M/s HVR Industries Pvt. Ltd against Union of India challenging order-in-original dated 15.01.2025 dismissed; alternate statutory remedy rule applied; Article 226 interference confined to exceptional circumstances; natural justice plea rejected; liberty to pursue statutory appeal; no merits opinion.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioners to avail alternate remedy(ies) available to them in accordance with law; Court clarified there is no expression of opinion on the merits of the matter. ¶¶21

M/S Hvr Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Another… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-8869-2025 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

123

¶5

CWP-8869-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2025

¶6

M/s HVR Industries Pvt. Ltd and another

¶7

......Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Union of India and others

¶10

......Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

¶12

Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Ajay Kalra, Senior Standing Counsel, and Mr. Pridhi Sandhu, Senior Standing Counsel, for the respondents.

¶14

LISA GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Prayer in this writ petition is for setting aside order-in-original dated 15.01.2025 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.3.

¶16

Admittedly, order dated 15.01.2025 is an appealable order. Rule of exhaustion of alternate remedy is a rule of discretion, however, it is a settled position that interference in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India should be caused only in exceptional circumstances and not as a matter of routine. We do not find any merit in the plea raised by learned counsel for petitioners that as there is violation of principles of natural justice, present writ petition should be entertained. All the pleas and

¶17

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.04.26 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CWP-8869-2025 (O&M) -2-

¶19

grounds as raised in this writ petition are very well within the realm of consideration by the appropriate statutory authority.

¶20

Learned counsel for petitioner is unable to point out any such exceptional ground which calls for interference in this case by passing the statutory remedy available to the petitioners.

¶21

In the given facts and circumstances as above, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioners to avail alternate remedy(ies) available to them in accordance with law. It is clarified that there is no expression of opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶22

(LISA GILL) JUDGE

¶23

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE

¶24

22.04.2025 Virrendra

¶25

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No

¶26

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.04.26 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

M/S Hvr Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Hvr Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Teja Singh Vs Financial Commissioner (APPEALS-1) & Ors.

Vijay Kumar Tandon Vs Union of India and Others

Smart Homes Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4) Faridabad and Others

Vandana Jain Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre and Ors.

Vandana Jain Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre,Delhi and Others

Baru Ram Vs State of Haryana and Ors.