Writ petition concerning the petitioner versus State of Haryana and others was disposed of by reference to a companion judgment of even date in CWP-5141-2023 (Ajay Pal Singh and others v. State of Haryana); no independent reasoning or decision is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
238-2
CWP-7904-2024 Date of Decision: 12.08.2025
MUNEESH B ABBAR …. Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF H ARYANA AND OTHERS …. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Present: M r. Shubham Bhardwaj, Advoc a te f or the petitioner.
M r. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advoca t e with M r. Abhishek Kumar Premi, Ad v ocate f or respondents No. 13 to 16.
M r. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryan a
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
F or orders, see the judgment/order of even date passed i n
CWP-5141-2023 titled as “Ajay Pal Singh and others versus State of
Haryana and others”.
( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) AUGUST 12, 2025 JUDGE Vishal sharma Whether speaking/reasone d : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VISHAL SHARMA 2025.08.21 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Muneesh Babbar
State of Haryana and others
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
