Disposed¶26

Vikram Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Sept 2025CWP/6475/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court; CWP-6475-2003; Vikram Singh v. State of Haryana; common disposal with CWP-12609-2005, CWP-7107-2001, CWP-19408-2005; Head Constable promotion effective 23.01.1991; show cause notice 25.05.1997; regularization w.e.f. 31.12.1999 instead of 23.01.1991; senior accommodated; petitioner retired on superannuation; Head Constable pay drawn; further promotion and service benefits; no further order warranted; pending applications disposed; Jagmohan Bansal J.; Aditya Yadav Advocate; Suneel Ranga DAG Haryana; decision 01.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

None — petitions disposed of; no further order warranted; pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶26

Vikram Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

370-1

¶4

CWP-6475-2003 Date of Decision: 01.09.2025

VIKRAM SINGH

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

And

¶11

Sr. No.	Case No.	Petitioner(s)	Respondent(s)
2.	CWP-12609-2005	Narinder Singh	State of Haryana and Ors.
3.	CWP-7107-2001	Dalel Singh and Anr.	State of Haryana and Ors.
4.	CWP-19408-2005	HC Jagdish Chander	State of Haryana and Ors.

¶12

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶13

Present:Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners (in CWP-12609-2005, CWP-7107-2001 and CWP-19408-2005)

¶14

Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana

¶15

¶16

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶17

As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-6475-2003 .

¶18

The petitioner was promoted as Head Constable from District Sonipat. His promotion was made effective from 23.01.1991. He was issued show cause notice dated 25.05.1997 calling upon to show

¶19

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.02 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CWP-6475-2003

¶21

-2-

¶22

cause as to why he should not be regularized in the rank of Head constable w.e.f. 31.12.1999 instead of 23.01.1991 to make the space for regularization of his senior. The respondent, thereafter, passed impugned order.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already retired on attaining the age of superannuation. On being asked, he confirmed that petitioner worked as Head Constable during his service tenure and got salary of Head Constable. He was also further promoted and given service benefits.

¶24