Dismissed¶24

Prem Kaur v. Permanent Lok Adalat, Sas Nagar, Mohali and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Sept 2025CWP/586/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short oral order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing CWP-586-2025 (O&M) as infructuous; withdrawal with liberty of contempt application under Article 215 Constitution of India and Sections 2(b) and 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 against proposed respondents No.9 to 11; disposal of miscellaneous applications; Vakalatnama of UCO Bank Standing Counsel for respondents No.4 and 5 taken on record; petitioner Prem Kaur; respondent Permanent Lok Adalat (P.U.S.), Mohali.

What did the court decide?

Main case dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to the petitioner to withdraw the contempt application and take recourse to the appropriate remedy in accordance with law. ¶24

Prem Kaur Vs Permanent Lok Adalat, Sas Nagar… — Contempt of Court | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-586-2025 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

¶4

CHANDIGARH

¶5

(105)

¶6

CWP-586-2025 (O&M)

¶7

Date of decision:- 05.09.2025

Prem Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

Permanent Lok Adalat (P.U.S.), Mohali, and others ...Respondents

¶12

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

¶13

Present:- Mr. Jatin Bansal, Advocate, and

¶14

Ms. Keerti Sandley, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶15

Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.

¶16

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)

¶17

CM-12850-CWP-2025

¶18

Noticing the prayer made in the application, main case is ordered to be listed for today itself.

¶19

CWP-586-2025 (O&M)

¶20

After obtaining no objection from the previous counsel, Mr. Sumit Narang, Advocate, Standing Counsel, UCO Bank, who is assisting Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, has put in appearance and has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5, which is taken on record.

¶21

On the basis of prayer made in the application (CM-12850-CWP2025), counsel for the petitioner states that the main case has become

¶22

PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.09.05 18:29infructuous and may be dismissed as such. I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶23

CWP-586-2025 (O&M) -2-

¶24

Ordered accordingly.

¶25

Mr. Jatin Bansal, Advocate submits that along with the main case, a miscellaneous application (CM-8338-CWP-2025) has been filed for initiating proceedings under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 2(b) and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against proposed respondents No.9 to 11, which is pending. He seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the said application with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

¶26