Chandigarh Administration & Anr. v. Central Administrative Tribunal

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Aug 2025CWP/4401/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-4401-2011 (with IOIN-1-CWP-4401-2011); Chandigarh Administration and another v. Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others; challenge to CAT order dated 10.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) on non-replacement of contractual appointees; disposed of in terms of CWP-19280-2011 decided 31.08.2024; Bench: Harsimran Singh Sethi and Vikas Suri, JJ.; decision dated 12.08.2025; speaking/reasoned: Yes; reportable: No.

What did the court decide?

Since the issue raised in the present writ petition is akin to the issue in CWP-19280-2011 (decided 31.08.2024) and counsel for the petitioners could not rebut the submission, the present petition is disposed of in terms of CWP-19280-2011. ¶¶29

Chandigarh Administration & Anr. Vs Central Administrative Tribunal — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

201 IOIN-1-CWP-4401-2011 in/and CWP-4401-2011 Date of Decision: 12.08.2025

¶3

Chandigarh Administration and another

¶4

....Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others

¶7

....Respondent

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

¶9

----

¶10

Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek K. Premi, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶11

Mr. P.S.Guliani, Advocate for respondents No.2, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 17.

¶12

¶13

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)

¶14

IOIN-1-CWP-4401-2011

¶15

The IOIN has been listed as the service of unserved respondents

¶16

is still pending.

¶17

On request of learned counsel for the parties, the main case is

¶18

taken on Board today.

¶19

The IOIN stands disposed of.

¶20

CWP-4401-2011

¶21

In the present petition, the challenge is to the order dated 10.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal

¶22

VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.08.13 19:49 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC

¶23

CWP-4401-2011

¶24

-2-

¶25

whereby it is held that the respondents be not replaced by another set of contractual appointees subject to certain conditions.

¶26

Learned counsel for respondents No.2, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 17 submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is akin to the issue raised in CWP-19280-2011 titled as Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh and another vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh and others , which writ petition has already been decided on 31.08.2024 and the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of in the

¶27

same terms.

¶28