Dismissed¶17
Raghunandan and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/3619/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; CWP-3619-2019; Raghunandan and another v. State of Haryana and others; decided 06.11.2025 by Justice Suvir Sehgall (oral); dismissal in default for non-prosecution due to petitioner absence on two consecutive occasions; no counsel for petitioners; representatives: Ravish Kaushik (AAG, Haryana), N.C.Kinra and Apoorva Kinra (respondents 5 and 6), Saransh Sabharwal (respondent 8); no holdings on substantive law; citable only as a record of default dismissal.
What did the court decide?
As the petitioners had been unrepresented on the past two occasions and appeared not interested in pursuing the writ petition, the Court dismissed the petition in default for non-prosecution. ¶17