Dilpreet Taneja v. Union of India and Others

What is this about?

The supplied judgment text is almost entirely corrupted (replacement-character/mojibake across paragraphs 1-18 and 20-28). The only fully legible passages are the digital-signature attestation lines at paragraph 19 and paragraph 29 ('MANOJ KUMAR 2025.02.11 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document'), which do not identify the court, bench, parties, case number, dates, issues, holdings or outcome. Paragraphs 14 and 22 contain short partially legible embedded character sequences within otherwise unreadable emphasised phrases that may encode statutory references, but they cannot be decoded or attributed to any identifiable Act or section. Accordingly, all extraction fields have been left empty or null rather than guessed.