Writ petition disposed of by reference to a separate order of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No.18184 of 2020 (Rajesh Mittal v. State of Haryana and others). No independent reasoning or decision is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.3438 of 2024
Date of Decision: July 18 , 2025 .
Pankaj Kumar
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., for respondent No.1-State of Punjab.
Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
LISA GILL, J.
For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.18184 of 2020 (Rajesh Mittal v. State of Haryana and others) decided vide separate order of even
date.
( LISA GILL ) JUDGE
( SUDEEPTI SHARMA ) July 18 , 2025. JUDGE ‘om
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Omkar Singh 2025.07.23 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Pankaj Kumar
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Lisa Gill
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
