Shiv Raj Khanna v. the State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Nov 2025CWP/31838/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court, Chandigarh; writ petition; suspension order dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-1) by respondent nos. 1 & 2; Article 311 Constitution of India; certiorari; mandamus; reinstatement with benefits same post same station; charge given to junior/lower-post person, order dated 29.09.2025 (Annexure P-9); FIR Annexure P-6; moral turpitude; departmental proceedings; ACR/service record prayer; interim restraint against transfer; judgment body and outcome illegible due to OCR corruption.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shiv Raj Khanna Vs the State of Punjab and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

��

�� 

��

�� !"!�#$�%&��&��

��

��

��

��

��'�(�$ ��#)*+��,'&��-"�! ��&.&./�0/�1��

¶10

�� !�� "��#��

¶11

�� $$$

¶12

�&.&./�0/�1��&�2�'�+3

¶13

%� &��'��!�� '�(()*((+��,��-��!��''�!��.��/

¶14

0 To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned illegal and malafide order of suspension P.A. No. A2 (3) (E�9777933)�2025, 1/1202711 dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P�1) passed by respondent no. 1 & 2, illegally, unlawfully, arbitrarily and hence wrongful and malafide, totally de�hors the rules and in violation of article 311 of the Constitution of India and as such not sustainable in the eyes of law and hence liable to be quashed in Toto;

¶15

AND/OR

¶16

For issuance of writ order or directions specifically for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned order No. DFS�SE305 (E3)/1/2021�EST�3 (253478) /12120090 dated 29.09.2025 (Annexure P�9) vide which the respondent no. 2 illegally and unlawfully gave charge of the petitioner to some other person, who is junior and lower in post to the petitioner, though

¶17

HITESH 2025.11.06 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

¶18

��

¶19

��

¶20

the matter in issue was not related to office or to official duties and it was not going affect the official working or work of the petitioner in the office in official capacity:

¶21

AND/OR

¶22

For the issuance of writ order or respondents directions to the specifically in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all benefits and on the same post at the same station.

¶23

AND/OR

¶24

For issuance of interim directions to restrain the respondents from taking charge of the petitioner from the post working prior on to which he was issuance of impugned illegal suspension order and also from transferring the station of the petitioner on revocation of Annexure P�1, illegal and nonest suspension order;

¶25

AND/OR

¶26

To restrain the respondents from commencing proceedings, any departmental the basis on of impugned FIR Annexure P�6, which is not falling in the category of moral turpitude and hence warranted in the eyes of law:

¶27

AND/OR

¶28

To call for the records of service of the petitioner with the respondents upto date, along with record of his all ACR's and other record of his work done and anything reported by his immediate officer upto date cover, and to outstanding in a sealed the examine service unblemished record of the petitioner upto date, such and to issue any other directions to the respondents, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of this case.

¶29

(� 1��. �� . ��'�� ' ��

¶30

�� 2��.��2��1�� (3�%4�(4(5�� #��1�� 6��7��"��,��

¶31

HITESH 2025.11.06 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

¶32

��

¶33

��

¶34

��'�� '��!�� '' ��#�� !��.��!��#��"�� ,��!�''��#��.��''�� .�� '��/ ��.��''��'��.��.��