Roshni Goyal and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP-3165-2024 (O&M), High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decided 20.03.2025. Petitioners: Roshni Goyal and another (counsel: Sandeep Thakan). Respondents: State of Haryana and others incl. HSVP (counsel: Ankur Mittal AAG, Svaneel Jaswal AAG, P.P. Chahar Sr. DAG, Saurabh Mago DAG, Karan Jindal AAG; Parmod Sharma for respondent-HSVP). Bench: Sureshwar Thakur J. (author, oral order) with Vikas Suri J. Covered by and disposed in terms of CWP-4769-2020 (Anil Kumar Yadav and others v. State of Punjab and others), decided the same day; State counsel raised no dispute on coverage. No statute cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of in terms of the verdict rendered by this Court the same day in CWP-4769-2020 (Anil Kumar Yadav and others vs. State of Punjab and others). ¶17