Dismissed¶16

Rakesh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Rohtak and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 May 2025CWP/31163/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; CWP-31163-2018 (O&M); decision dated 20.02.2025; Rakesh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Rohtak and ors; dismissal for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of petitioner; no substantive issue decided; no statute or precedent discussed; no quantum; coram: Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.; State represented by Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

What did the court decide?

Since no one appeared for the petitioner on two consecutive dates of hearing, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present remedy. ¶15

Rakesh Vs Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Rohtak and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

269

¶3

CWP-31163-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.02.2025

RAKESH

...... Petitioner

VERSUS

PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ROHTAK AND ORS

¶8

...... Respondents

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶10

¶11

Present :- None for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

¶13

*******

¶14

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)

¶15

On the last date of hearing, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and petition was adjourned for today. Today again no one has appeared on his behalf. It can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present remedy.

¶16