Bhinder Singh v. State of Haryana and Others

What is this about?

Judgment received in severely corrupted form: paragraphs 1 through 48 consist almost entirely of unreadable replacement/mojibake characters, including all headings, body text, and both tabular sections; no court name, case number/type, filing or decision dates, bench composition, party or advocate names, statutory references, cited precedents, issue statements, holdings, disposition, or monetary figures survive in legible form. The only verbatim-legible string anywhere in the file is the recurring electronic-signature footer 'SUNIL CHANDER 2025.10.18 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document', which attests to the PDF but does not itself identify the court, bench, parties, or result, so it grounds no extraction field. Under strict verbatim-grounding and no-invention rules every substantive field has been left null/empty rather than guessed. A clean, uncorrupted copy should be supplied before this case is relied upon.