Disposed¶20

Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Apr 2025CWP/21403/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-21403-2024, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, Kuldeep Tiwari J. (Oral), decided 22.04.2025 — mandamus sought for issuance of Pharmacist registration certificate; respondents: State of Haryana and Haryana State Pharmacy Council; written statement disclosed speaking order dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure R-2/6) dismissing petitioner's application; no further direction required; petition disposed of/closed; liberty to challenge speaking order before appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

No mandamus issued; petition closed and disposed of in view of the speaking order dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure R-2/6), with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge that order before the appropriate forum. ¶20

Pawan Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-21403-2024 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(272) CWP-21403-2024 Date of Decision : 22.04.2025

¶4

Pawan Ku m ar …Petitioner

¶5

Vers u s

¶6

State of Ha r yana and others ...Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶8

Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, H a ryana for respondent No.1.

¶10

Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶11

¶12

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL)

¶13

Through the instant writ petiti o n, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constit u tion of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, u p on the respon d ents, to issue registration certi fi cate in favour of the petitioner as ‘Pharmacis t ’, in a time bound manner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2-Haryana S t ate Pharmacy C ouncil, has caused appearance, and has filed the written statem e nt on behalf o f the respondent No.2, today in t he Court. The same is taken on t he record.

¶15

The written statement (supra ) , speaks about the final decis i on taken by t h e authorities concerned, by drawing a speaking order da t ed 18.03.2025 (Annexure R-2/6), wherein, the application preferred by t he

¶16

MANPREET SINGH2025.04.23 14:31 petitioner, h as been dismissed. I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶17

CWP-21403-2024 2

¶18

In view of the above, no furth e r direction is required to be pas s ed in the insta n t petition, and the same is hereby, closed .

¶19

However, in case, the petitio n er fetches any grievance from t he speaking o r der (supra), he is at liberty to challenge the same before the a pt forum conc e rned, by filing apt motion.

¶20

Consequently, the instant writ p etition is disposed of .

¶21

(KULDEEP TIWARI)

¶22

JUDGE

¶23

April 22, 2 0 25 Manpreet

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.23 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baljinder Kaur Vs Union of India and Others

Sanjay Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mini Arora and Ors. Vs Deputy Commissioner, Mohali and Others

Health Choice Poultary Farm Vs Union of India and Others

Amitava Choudhury and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Bahia Rice Mills and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others