Dismissed¶12
Punjab and Sind Bank v. District Magistrate , Jind and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/205/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Punjab and Sind Bank v District Magistrate Jind and others; CWP-205-2022 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; decided 08.08.2025; Bench: Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice (author) and Sanjiv Berry, Judge; writ petition dismissed as rendered infructuous because possession of the secured asset was physically handed over to the petitioner-Bank long back; pending application disposed of; counsel: Simranjit Singh (proxy for Rajnish Kumar Jindal) for petitioner, Deepak Balyan Addl. Advocate General Haryana for respondents; no statutes or cases cited.
What did the court decide?
As possession of the secured asset had been physically handed over to the petitioner-Bank long back, the cause raised in the writ petition was held to have been rendered infructuous. ¶12