Disposed¶14

Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC1 May 2025CWP/19837/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-19837-2001 (O&M); Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab and others; Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; Jagmohan Bansal, J.; decision dated 01.05.2025; writ petition disposed for want of prosecution (no representation since 2006); petitioner (retired ASI, superannuated 31.05.2009) deceased; liberty to legal representatives to revive within three months if cause survives; pending applications disposed; Aman Dhir, DAG Punjab appeared for State; no advocate for petitioner; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the legal representative(s) of the petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months, if cause survives. ¶14

Rajinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

106

¶3

CWP-19837-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.05.2025

¶4

Rajinder Singh …Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Punjab and others …Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶8

Present: - None for the petitioner

¶9

Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab

¶10

¶11

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J . (Oral)

¶12

Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the petitioner retired as Assistant Sub-Inspector on 31.05.2009 on attaining the age of superannuation. He has passed away.

¶13

There is no representation of the petitioner since 2006. It appears that legal representative(s) of the petitioner is/are not interested to pursue the present petition.

¶14

In the backdrop, the present petition stands disposed with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months, if cause survives.

¶15