Dismissed¶18

Fakaruddin v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Aug 2025CWP/19602/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fakaruddin v. State of Haryana and others, CWP-19602-2024 (O&M), High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decided 20.08.2025 by Justice Suvir Sehgal (oral). Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek an alternative remedy; stay of operation of respondent No.5's order dated 18.04.2024 (interim order dated 13.08.2024) continued for four weeks. Keywords: withdrawal of writ petition, liberty to avail remedy, continuation of interim stay, pending applications disposed, Punjab and Haryana High Court.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law; interim order dated 13.08.2024 continued in operation for four weeks from 20.08.2025; pending applications disposed of. ¶18

Fakaruddin Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CWP-19602-2024 (O&M) -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

¶3

CHANDIGARH

¶4

(105) CWP-19602-2024 (O&M)

¶5

Date of decision:- 20.08.2025

Fakaruddin

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

¶11

Present:- Mr. Anshul Mangla, Advocate, with

¶12

Mr. Vinay Kumar Arya, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

¶14

Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate, for Ms. Amrita Nagpal, Advocate , for respondent No.6.

¶15

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chhokar, Advocate, for respondent No.7.

¶16

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)

¶17

After addressing for some time, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶18

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶19

At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that while issuing notice of motion on 13.08.2024, this Court had directed that operation of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024, passed by respondent No. 5, shall remain stayed. He has requested that interim protection may be continued for a

¶20

PARDEEP NAUTIYALreasonable period in order to avail the remedy. 2025.08.20 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶21

CWP-19602-2024 (O&M) -2-

¶22

There is a substance in the submission made by counsel for the petitioner.

¶23

It is directed that interim order dated 13.08.2024 shall remain in operation for a period of four weeks from today in order to enable the petitioner to take recourse in accordance with law.

¶24

Pending applications stand disposed of.

¶25

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE

¶26

20.08.2025 Pardeep

¶27

Whether Speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶28

PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.08.20 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Fakaruddin v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fakaruddin v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baldev Singh Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Usha Devi Vs Pspcl and Others

Kamaljeet Verma Vs Bhakra Beas Management Board Th Its MD and Ors.

Rajender Contractor Vs State of Haryana and Others

Makhan Lal Tanwar Vs the State of Haryana through Its Director, Directorate School Education, Shiksha Sadan

Shailender Vs State of Haryana and Another