Dismissed¶2
Avinash Kumar v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/19378/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Brief oral-dismissal writ case: CWP-19378-2025 (O&M), decided 14.07.2025 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Petitioner Avinash Kumar (counsel: Mr. Jasbir Singh) versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others (counsel: Mr. Sanjeev Ghai). Counsel could not establish that the petitioner had ever done vending work in the respondents' area; the Court stated 'No case for interference is made out' and dismissed the petition; pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no quantum involved, no dissent.
What did the court decide?
Learned counsel for the petitioner could not show that the petitioner had at any point of time been doing the vending work in the area under the respondents. ¶1