Allowed

Ayyub Khan and Other v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Jul 2025CWP/19026/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, being ad-idem to a prior judgment in Mahavir Singh Tanwar, finally disposed of this writ petition by allowing it and directing the State Government to decide on the retired petitioners' benefits within two months.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; State Government directed to decide on retired petitioners' retiral benefits within two months.

Ayyub Khan and Other Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

112 I N THE HIGH COURT OF PU N JAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH

¶2

CWP- 1 9026-2025 (O&M) Date o f Decision: 11.07.2025

¶3

Ayyub Khan a nd others

¶4

…Petitioners

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Hary a na and others …Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶8

Present: D r. Jaiveer Singh Malik, Advoc a te for the petitioners. ( through video conferencing). M r. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. AG, H aryana.

¶9

¶10

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)

¶11

N otice of motion.

¶12

M r. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A G , Haryana, accepts notice o n

¶13

behalf of the r espondents.

¶14

L earned counsel for the parties a re ad-idem that the issue raise d

¶15

in the presen t petition stands finally adjudi c ated by this Court in Mahavir Singh Tanwar vs. State of Haryana, C W P No.14627-2024 and othe r connected ca s es, decided on 24.04.2025, whe r ein, this Court held as under:- “ 9. We have noticed the afore s aid submissions. However, th e s ame would have no impedime n t in disposing of all these wri t p etitions as the claim of the w r it petitioners has to be decide d f inally now in terms of the ord e r passed by the Supreme Cour t o n 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneou s application Dairy No.2400 o f 2 024 in Civil Appeal No.3 9 33 of 2023 with connecte d m iscellaneous applications title d as "Union of India and anothe r v ersus M. Siddaraj (supra).

¶16

RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.14 16:07 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

¶17

CWP-19026-2025 (O&M)

¶18

[2]

¶19

10. We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allow them in the same terms as above and with further directions to the Administration-respondents to pass specific orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required to be adjusted and released.

¶20

11. The State authorities shall also take into consideration any policy decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of tenure.:”

¶21

In view of the above, this writ petition is decided mutatis

¶22

mutandis and the necessary exercise shall be completed within two months henceforth.

¶23

All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.

¶24

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

¶25

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA)

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

11.07.2025 rajesh

¶28

Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No

¶29

RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.14 16:07 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Ayyub Khan and Other v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyub Khan and Other v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jiwan Lal and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ex Subedar Chander Bhan and Anr.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Prem Lata and Anr.

Union Territory, Chandigarh and Others Vs Kuldeep Singh and Others

Jagdish Kumar Raheja Vs Suman Rani

Sunita Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others