Hardev Singh Parmar v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 May 2025CWP/16384/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, decision 27.05.2025, Kuldeep Tiwari J (oral) — Hardev Singh Parmar v. State of Punjab & ors, CWP-16384-2002 (with IOIN application): mandamus sought under Articles 226/227 for production of case record and outcome of complaints against private respondents and completion of departmental proceedings; written statement stated enquiry already concluded on 29.08.2002 with no allegation found correct; petition closed and disposed of; no costs/quantum; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

Since the enquiry on the complaint has already been concluded (on 29.08.2002, per the respondents' written statement, with none of the petitioner's allegations found correct), no further direction is required to be passed in the writ petition, and the petition is closed. ¶¶16

Hardev Singh Parmar Vs State of Punjab… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

IOIN-1-CWP-16384-2002 in/and 1 CWP-16384-2002

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(201) IOIN-1-CWP-16384-2002 in/and CWP-16384-2002 Date of Decision : 27.05.2025

¶4

Hardev Sin g h Parmar …Petitioner

¶5

Vers u s

¶6

State of Pu n jab and others ...Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶8

Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate a n d Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Pu n jab.

¶10

¶11

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL)

¶12

At the oral request of the lear n ed counsel for the petitioner, m a in case is take n on board today itself for adjud i cation.

¶13

Through the instant writ petiti o n, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constit u tion of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus , u p on the respondents No.1 to 6, not only to pro d uce the record of the instant c a se, but also the outcome of the complaints, as f iled by the petitioner, wherein, he has alleged some allegations against the p rivate respondents, and further to take the de p artmental proceedings to its log i cal end. 3. In response to the notice issu e d by this Court, written statem e nt on behalf o f the respondents was filed on d a ted 25.05.2003. As per the writ t en statement ( s upra), the enquiry on the com p laint has already been concluded, on dated 29.08.2002, and none of the alleg a tions, as levelled by the petitio n er MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶14

IOIN-1-CWP-16384-2002 in/and 2 CWP-16384-2002

¶15

was found t o be correct.

¶16

Since the enquiry has alrea d y been concluded, therefore, no further dire c tion is required to be passed i n the instant writ petition, and t he same is her e by, closed.

¶17

5. Consequently, the instant writ p etition is disposed of . 6. Pending applications, if any, st a nd disposed of accordingly.

¶18

(KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE

¶19

May 27, 20 2 5 Manpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶20

MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Hardev Singh Parmar v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardev Singh Parmar v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pallavi Vijan Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rocky Sharma @ Gagandeep Sharma Vs Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services) Mansa and Another

M/S Harinder Enterprises Vs the State of Punjab and Others

M/S White Oak Motel and Restaurants Vs State of Haryana and Others

Narinder Goel Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Others

Nainway Private Limited Vs State of Haryana