Dismissed¶23

Shaukat @ Sokat v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Apr 2025CWP/16084/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; CWP-16084-2024; Shaukat @ Sokat v. State of Haryana and others; Kuldeep Tiwari, Judge; decision date 21.04.2025; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal sought on account of compromise between parties; vakalatnamas of counsel for respondents 3, 7 and 8 taken on record; oral, non-reasoned disposal; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition pursuant to the stated compromise; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶23

Shaukat @ Sokat Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CWP-16084-2024 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(256) CWP-16084-2024 Date of Decision : 21.04.2025

Shaukat @ S okat

…Petitioner

Vers u s

State of Ha r yana and others ...Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶9

Present: Ms. Malkit Kaur, Advocate fo r Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, H a ryana.

¶11

Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, A dvocate for respondent No.3.

¶12

Ms. Palkin Bhardwaj, Advocat e for Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advoc a te for respondent No.7.

¶13

Ms. Simran Goria, Advocate f o r Mr. Edward Augustine George, Advocate for respondent No.8.

¶14

¶15

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL)

¶16

Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, A dvocate has caused appearance on behalf of th e respondent No.3, and has file d memo of appearance today in t he Court. The same is taken on the record. He undertakes to file his d u ly executed v a kalatnama in his favour with th e Registry of this Court.

¶17

Ms. Palkin Bhardwaj, Advo c ate for Mr. Sanyam Khetarp a l, Advocate f o r respondent No.7, as well as Ms. Simran Goria, Advocate f or Mr. Edwar d Augustine George, Advocate for respondent No.8, has caus e d

¶18

MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.22 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶19

CWP-16084-2024 2

¶20

appearance, and has filed duly executed va k alatnama(s) respectively, in th e ir favour toda y in the Court. The same are tak e n on the record.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, infor m s this Court, that the matter has been c o mpromised between the parties concerned, and therefore, she seeks per m ission to withdraw the inst a nt

¶22

petition.

¶23

Consequently, the instant petit i on is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶24

(KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE

¶25

April 21, 2 0 25 Manpreet

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶27

MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.22 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Shaukat @ Sokat v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaukat @ Sokat v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rozy Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rajendra Ispat Private Limited Vs the State of Punjab and Others

Shakti Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Majed Abdullah Alarifi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sukhdayal and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ishwar Garg Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigam Ltd. & Anr.