A one-line order in a writ petition disposing of the matter by reference to the court's detailed order of even date in a companion writ petition, without recording independent reasons or relief in this order itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-15841-2007 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.09.2025
PARDEEP KUMAR
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Yogita Verma, Advocates for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG Haryana
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in CWP-19997-
2008 titled as “ O.P. Arora vs. State of Haryana and Others ”
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 16.09.2025 JUDGE Meenu
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No
MEENU 2025.09.18 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.P. Arora vs. State of Haryana and OthersReferred
CWP-19997-2008
Pardeep Kumar
State of Haryana and Ors.
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
