Disposed¶24

Union of India and Others v. Chanan Singh and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Jul 2025CWP/15714/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh, decision dated 07.07.2025; CM-9014-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-15714-2013 (O&M); Union of India and others v. Chanan Singh and another; disposal of writ petition in terms of the order in Ram Sanjiwan (CWP-11626-2020, decided 10.02.2025); fresh decision within one month considering Jaggo case and Shripal v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad; Coram: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Meenakshi I. Mehta, JJ.; advocates: Rishav Sharma (respondent No. 1), Pankaj Gupta, Sr. Panel Counsel (UOI).

What did the court decide?

Writ petition CWP-15714-2013 (O&M) disposed of in terms of the order in Ram Sanjiwan (supra), with the fresh decision to be taken within one month; application CM-9014-CWP-2025 allowed; all pending applications disposed of. ¶24

Union of India and Others Vs Chanan Singh and Another — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CWP-15714-2013 (O&M)

¶2

Page 1 of 2

¶3

101-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CM-9014-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-15714-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2025

¶5

UNION OF I N DIA AND OTHERS

¶6

. . . . Petitioner s Vs.

¶7

CHANAN SI N GH AND ANOTHER

¶8

. . . . Respondent s

¶9

****

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶11

********

¶12

Present: M r. Rishav Sharma, Advocate f or the applicant/respondent No. 1

¶13

M r. Pankaj Gupta, Sr. Panel Co u nsel, Advocate f or the petitioners/UOI.

¶14

¶15

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

¶16

Applic a tion has been filed for dispo s al of writ petition in terms o f order p assed by this Court in CWP-11626-2020 titled as ‘Union of India and others vs. Ram Sanjiwan and another’ and other connected writ petitions, decided on 10.02.2025 .

¶17

Both t h e counsel are ad idem that t he issue raised in the presen t petitio n can be adjudicated in terms o f order passed by this Court i n Ram Sanjiwan (supra) .

¶18

We ha d , in the aforesaid writ petitions after considering the law as lai d down fr om time to time by the Apex C o urt, directed as under:

¶19

MOHIT GOYAL 2025.07.08 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CWP-15714-2013 (O&M)

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

“9. In view of the above, w e direct the appellant(s) t o take a fresh decision and also ta k e into consideration the l a w as laid down by the Hon’ble A p ex Court in the case of Jaggo case (supra) and Shripal and another v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, Civil Appeal Nos.8158-8179 of 2024 , d ecided on 31.01.2025.