Ramgopal v. State of Hy.Etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP-15057-2001, Ram Gopal v. State of Haryana and others, Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh, decided 21-07-2025 by Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. Writ petition disposed of as not pressed/infructuous in view of the statement of the State counsel (Ms. Anupal, Addl. A.G.) that the petitioner's claim, identical to that in CWP No.15621 of 1998 (Mange Ram Garg and ors. v. State of Haryana and ors., disposed of by a Coordinate Bench on 07.08.2024 with relief already granted), would be considered in light of that decision and extended within eight weeks by a speaking order if not already granted, failing which reasons would be recorded and conveyed. Advocates: Sanjiv Gupta for the petitioner. Speaking order: YES; Reportable: NO.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed further (having become infructuous); petitioner's claim to be considered in light of CWP No.15621 of 1998 and, if identical and the relief not already granted, to be extended within eight weeks by an appropriate speaking order, failing which reasons to be recorded in a speaking order conveyed to the petitioner.