Cross-referenced disposal: petitioner referred to orders of even date in a related case for the actual decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
205-2
CWP-14400-2013
DAI RAM
... Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.
Present: Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see the order/judgment of even date passed in CWP-
22394-2011 titled as Satbir Versus State of Haryana and Others.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 26, 2025. JUDGE
Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.05.27 06:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
Dai Ram
State of Haryana
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
