Dismissed¶23

Kuldip Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Mar 2025CWP/14391/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-14391-2022; Kuldip Kaur vs State of Punjab and others; Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Kuldeep Tiwari, J.; decided 27.03.2025; writ petition dismissed as not pressed; two FIRs registered against respondent No.5 Harjit Kaur pursuant to petitioner's complaint (Annexure P-14); petitioner's possession over house in question restored; grievance redressed; liberty reserved to approach competent authority/forum for future grievances; counsel: Mansur Ali, Amanpreet Kooner, Jasreet Singh Malik (petitioner), Pardeep Bajaj DAG Punjab, Amit Gupta (respondent No.5).

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority/forum in future in case any grievance out of the present dispute arises, for redressal thereof. ¶23

Kuldip Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

102 CWP-14391-2022 Date of Decision : March 27, 2025

KULDIP KAUR

-PETITIONER

V/S

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

¶7

-RESPONDENTS

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶9

Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate with

¶10

Mr. Amanpreet Kooner, Advocate and Mr. Jasreet Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab.

¶12

Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

¶13

¶14

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Through the instant writ petition, prayer is made for issuance of directions upon the official respondents to examine the grievance of the petitioner, as expressed by her in the complaint (Annexure P-14).

¶16

Consequent upon issuance of notice on the instant writ petition, the official respondents No.1 to 3 filed the short reply dated 03.07.2023, disclosing therein that, pursuant to the making of complaint by the petitioner, two FIRs have already been registered against the respondent No.5- Harjit Kaur. Not only this, petitioner’s possession over the house in question has also been restored.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the disclosures (supra) made in the short reply and submits that, as of now, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, hence he does not want

¶18

DEVINDER YADAV 2025.03.28 09:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶19

¶20

CWP-14391-2022

¶21

to press the instant writ petition at this stage. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioner to, in case any grievance out of the present dispute arises in future, approach the competent authority/forum for redressal thereof.

¶22

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed,

¶23

as not pressed at this stage , however, with liberty (supra) .

¶24

(KULDEEP TIWARI) March 27, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

¶25

DEVINDER YADAV 2025.03.28 09:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Kuldip Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldip Kaur v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranjal Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Other

M/S Kulwinder Singh and Company Vs State of Punjab and Others

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs M/S Bindal Associates and Others

Sukhdev Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Vinay Kumar Bajaj and Others Vs State of Punjab & Others

Mikado Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Others